Passer au contenu

/ Faculté de droit

Je donne

Rechercher

Liens rapides
Futur étudiantFutur étudiant
Étudiants actuelsÉtudiants actuels
La rechercheLa recherche
Nous joindreNous joindre
InfolettreInfolettre
Facebook
Instagram
Twitter
LinkedIn
Youtube

Pour une approche unifiée du droit et de l'innovation

Séminaire Droit et innovation

Formateur : Pierre Larouche, Tiburg University

Résumé :

'The legal literature concerning the interplay between innovation and law is split between two streams: law and economics (broadly defined) and law and technology. They seem to exist in parallel and largely nonintersecting inter-disciplinary silos. This paper attempts to reconcile these two streams and identify synergies. Even the definition of innovation needs to be recast in order to integrate both streams: it is best seen as a combination of three elements, namely (i) an invention, (ii) which is diffused and adopted and (iii) which has a positive social impact. One of the main shortcomings of law and technology lies in how it sees innovation as an essentially technological phenomenon, and one that is largely exogenous to the regulatory process. Law and economics literature pays closer attention to regulation for innovation (or innovativeness): it identifies market failures, such as market power, and externalities flowing from the public good nature of information. Yet law and economics literature assumes that innovation is good for welfare, without more. Law and technology can usefully help to make up for that flaw; it takes a more critical view of innovation and is rather concerned with the regulation of innovation. The vexed issue of disconnect – the difficulty for law to keep up with the pace of innovation – shows how these two streams can be combined. Within regulatory disconnect, one can distinguish a horizontal dimension (time) and a vertical dimension (level of generality). Much law and technology literature advocates early and technology-specific intervention to deal with emerging innovations. Law and economics literature would point in the other direction on both dimensions, but beyond that, it also offers insights into institutional models that allow a balancing of the concerns arising from each stream of literature, using independent and accountable regulatory authorities'

 

Formation d’un dispensateur reconnu aux fins de la formation continue obligatoire du Barreau du Québec pour une durée de 1h30.

Emplacement : Université de Montréal - Pavillon Maximilien-Caron 3101, chemin de la tour Salon François-Chevrette (A-3464) Montréal H3T 1J7 QC Canada